Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Construction of WhitenessAn Interdisciplinary Analysis of Race Formation and the Meaning of a White Identity$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Stephen Middleton, David R. Roediger, and Donald M. Shaffer

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9781496805553

Published to University Press of Mississippi: September 2017

DOI: 10.14325/mississippi/9781496805553.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of
date: 18 December 2017

Restitution Claims for Wrongful Enslavement and the Doctrine of the Master’s Good Faith

Restitution Claims for Wrongful Enslavement and the Doctrine of the Master’s Good Faith

Chapter:
(p.44) 2 Restitution Claims for Wrongful Enslavement and the Doctrine of the Master’s Good Faith
Source:
The Construction of Whiteness
Author(s):

Robert Westley

Publisher:
University Press of Mississippi
DOI:10.14325/mississippi/9781496805553.003.0003

This chapter begins with the suggestion made by Judge Posner in his opinion for the majority in the case of In re African-American Slave Descendants Litigation to the effect that the injuries exacted by slavery were imposed on the slaves alone, and thus provide no standing to their descendants to sue for restitution of their ancestors’ injuries. Legal procedural doctrines such as standing or time limits or sovereign immunity have successfully blocked consideration by courts of contemporary claims for slavery reparations. In light of conflicting views about the significance of temporality, it has become clear that part of the challenge of understanding contemporary whiteness practices was to make a constructive return to their foundational moments during slavery, to determine what discourses governed the allocation of restitution in both law and equity when enslavement was acknowledged in some cases to have been wrongful, and no procedural doctrines blocked consideration of restitution on the merits.

Keywords:   African American Slave Descendants Litigation, Restitution, Slavery reparations, Contemporary whiteness, Legal procedural doctrines

University Press of Mississippi requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.